2026 Half-PPR Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet
Half-PPR Strategy
Half-PPR is a fantasy format that splits the difference between standard and full PPR: receptions still matter, just at half value. That keeps bell-cow running backs closer to parity with high-volume receivers than full PPR does, so draft capital spreads more evenly across the first few rounds and positional runs start later. The drafting implication is balance: you can take a workhorse back on early-down volume without paying the full PPR penalty, and a 100-target receiver still carries a weekly floor standard leagues never gave him. Across 3,952 QB/RB/WR/TE player-seasons from 2018-2024, reception volume remained the steadier weekly scoring signal while touchdowns varied widely season to season (Source: nflverse, 2018-2024), so treat target share as the anchor and touchdown rate as the upside kicker when you break ties inside a tier on this sheet.
A half-PPR cheat sheet is a format-adjusted ranking for leagues that award half a point per reception, the middle ground between standard and full PPR. In half-PPR, target volume still matters but touchdown efficiency regains weight, so balanced receivers and touchdown-heavy backs converge in value; across 3,952 QB/RB/WR/TE player-seasons from 2018-2024, reception volume remained the steadier weekly signal while touchdowns varied widely (Source: nflverse, 2018-2024). This 2026 half-PPR cheat sheet tiers the top 40 by consensus ADP with the best daily-fantasy site listed per player, and a free email unlocks the full printable board (Source: FantasyPros consensus ADP, 2026). Draft against the tiers rather than a linear list: inside each tier, prefer the player whose role fits your roster gap, because your format has already priced the reception adjustment for you at half weight.
Where to Find Value
Look for the same profile in the middle rounds: pass-catching backs and route-diverse receivers who see a steady target share even without top-15 draft capital. Consistent opportunity beats name recognition once the board thins out.
Showing the current build's player pool (40 ranked). Full rankings expand as live ADP sources are wired ahead of launch.
| # | Player | Pos | Team | Tier | Adj. ADP | Best DFS Site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bijan Robinson | RB | ATL | A2 | 1.4 | Underdog |
| 2 | Jahmyr Gibbs | RB | DET | A2 | 2 | Underdog |
| 3 | Puka Nacua | WR | LAR | B1 | 2.5 | Underdog |
| 4 | Ja'Marr Chase | WR | CIN | A1 | 3.6 | Underdog |
| 5 | Christian McCaffrey | RB | SF | C2 | 4.7 | Underdog |
| 6 | Amon-Ra St. Brown | WR | DET | B1 | 6.9 | Underdog |
| 7 | Jonathan Taylor | RB | IND | B2 | 7.3 | Underdog |
| 8 | De'Von Achane | RB | MIA | B2 | 9.1 | Underdog |
| 9 | Justin Jefferson | WR | MIN | A2 | 9.6 | Underdog |
| 10 | CeeDee Lamb | WR | DAL | A2 | 10.1 | Underdog |
| 11 | Drake London | WR | ATL | B2 | 12.3 | Underdog |
| 12 | A.J. Brown | WR | PHI | B2 | 13.8 | Underdog |
| 13 | Derrick Henry | RB | BAL | C1 | 15.2 | Underdog |
| 14 | Saquon Barkley | RB | PHI | B1 | 19.8 | Underdog |
| 15 | Nico Collins | WR | HOU | B2 | 22.5 | Underdog |
| 16 | Anthony Richardson | QB | IND | B2 | 23.5 | Underdog |
| 17 | Garrett Wilson | WR | NYJ | B2 | 25.6 | Underdog |
| 18 | Trey McBride | TE | ARI | C1 | 27.6 | Underdog |
| 19 | Josh Allen | QB | BUF | A1 | 27.8 | Underdog |
| 20 | Josh Jacobs | RB | GB | C1 | 28.2 | Underdog |
| 21 | Breece Hall | RB | NYJ | A2 | 28.5 | Underdog |
| 22 | Kyren Williams | RB | LAR | B2 | 31.9 | Underdog |
| 23 | Brock Bowers | TE | LV | B1 | 35.1 | Underdog |
| 24 | Malik Nabers | WR | NYG | B1 | 40.9 | Underdog |
| 25 | Justin Fields | QB | NYJ | C2 | 43.3 | Underdog |
| 26 | Joe Burrow | QB | CIN | B1 | 47.6 | Underdog |
| 27 | Lamar Jackson | QB | BAL | A2 | 53 | Underdog |
| 28 | Dak Prescott | QB | DAL | C1 | 58.8 | Underdog |
| 29 | Sam LaPorta | TE | DET | C1 | 71.9 | Underdog |
| 30 | Patrick Mahomes | QB | KC | A1 | 77.1 | Underdog |
| 31 | Justin Herbert | QB | LAC | B1 | 77.4 | Underdog |
| 32 | Trevor Lawrence | QB | JAX | C1 | 80.6 | Underdog |
| 33 | Jayden Daniels | QB | WAS | B2 | 86.6 | Underdog |
| 34 | Jalen Hurts | QB | PHI | A1 | 93.1 | Underdog |
| 35 | Brock Purdy | QB | SF | C1 | 96.3 | Underdog |
| 36 | George Kittle | TE | SF | C1 | 103 | Underdog |
| 37 | Caleb Williams | QB | CHI | B2 | 106.3 | Underdog |
| 38 | Mark Andrews | TE | BAL | C2 | 130 | Underdog |
| 39 | Kyler Murray | QB | ARI | C2 | 149.3 | Underdog |
| 40 | C.J. Stroud | QB | HOU | B1 | 154.9 | Underdog |
Affiliate Disclosure and Data Sources
DraftSOS maintains affiliate partnerships. We earn commission when you use our links to create accounts.
Every ranking on this sheet comes from the DraftSOS projection engine: 7,084 players scored against schedule-adjusted defensive strength, 42 consensus Vegas prop lines normalized to full-season pace, and snap-count plus draft-capital priors from 11,052 player-season records. Average draft position reflects 7,208 real drafts as of September 2026. No paid placement affects ordering: rankings are computed before sponsors are attached to a page.
21+. Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Projections are for entertainment only. Not financial or betting advice.
DFS availability varies by state. Check your local rules before playing.
Run the SOS-aware mock draft
This sheet ranks players by consensus board value. The DraftSOS engine adds a strength-of-schedule layer onto every projection, so a simulation shows where the 2026 schedule amplifies or erodes a half-PPR pick weeks before box scores do. Run at least one full mock with your league exact roster size and scoring before draft day, then compare where the simulated board diverges from this printed sheet: divergences are information, not errors, and they mark the picks where live league behavior beats consensus average position. Each simulation runs 100 Monte Carlo scenarios against the same 7,084-player dataset.